This paper deals with the acquisition of foreign technology and with foreign direct investment by the four largest South Korean business groups. Major conclusions are: (1) the groups successfully acquired foreign, state-of-the-art technology for large-scale production of lower and middle market segment products within a very broad range of industries; (2) the most important current problems for the groups (lack of own high-technology and low equity and profit rates) are genuine results of the same strategy, which led to the successful acquisition of foreign non-high-end technology; (3) although all four groups undertook foreign direct investment of considerable scale, these investments were mainly restricted to a few geographic areas and product groups, and it is far too early to speak of a real ‘globalization’ of group operations.

PAGES
59 – 75
DOI
All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Issues
Also in this issue:
-
Agnes Horvath, Magic and the Will to Science: A Political Anthropology of Liminal Technicality
-
Gibson Burrell, Ronald Hartz, David Harvie, Geoff Lightfoot, Simon Lilley and Friends, Shaping for Mediocrity: The Cancellation of Critical Thinking at our Universities
-
Bas de Boer, How Scientific Instruments Speak: Postphenomenology and Technological Mediations in Neuroscientific Practice
-
Bjørn Lomborg, False Alarm
-
How does innovation arise in the bicycle sector? The users’ role and their betrayal in the case of the ‘gravel bike’
The Four Largest South Korean Business Groups and Foreign Technology: Acquisition of Technology and Foreign Direct Investment
PAPERS