Technological progress involves conflicting consequences for the owners of intellectual property rights. On the one hand, the scope of these rights is enhanced and new subject matter is protected. On the other hand, the effective exercise of rights is often hampered and sometimes completely undermined. It is therefore timely to take stock of the effect of technological change on the traditional formulation of intellectual property rights. In particular, the following issues need to be considered: (i) the goals of intellectual property protection, (ii) the present scope and duration of protection, (iii) the present challenges, (iv) the legal constraints on change at the national and international levels, and (v) strategies for the future, including the reformulation of existing regimes and the adoption of sui generis schemes.

PAGES
53 – 82
DOI
All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Issues
Also in this issue:
-
Agnes Horvath, Magic and the Will to Science: A Political Anthropology of Liminal Technicality
-
Gibson Burrell, Ronald Hartz, David Harvie, Geoff Lightfoot, Simon Lilley and Friends, Shaping for Mediocrity: The Cancellation of Critical Thinking at our Universities
-
Bas de Boer, How Scientific Instruments Speak: Postphenomenology and Technological Mediations in Neuroscientific Practice
-
Bjørn Lomborg, False Alarm
-
How does innovation arise in the bicycle sector? The users’ role and their betrayal in the case of the ‘gravel bike’
NEW WINE INTO OLD BOTTLES: TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
Original Articles