PAGES

187 – 197

DOI

10.1080/08109029908629549
©
DALLAS HANSON. JOHN STEEN. WAYNE O’DONOHUE.

All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Issues

Also in this issue:

Management of Basic Research and Development: Lessons from the Australian Experience

DALLAS HANSON. JOHN STEEN. WAYNE O’DONOHUE.

Management of science and related basic research and development by the state is not a new phenomenon. In this paper it is argued, on the basis of recent Australian experience, that the conventional approach which assumes that the research community is a simple system is deeply flawed. Specifically, it is argued that any pattern of government funding which assumes linear relationships between funding and scientific outputs is unlikely to be productive. Further, it is suggested that a quantitative approach to research management is counter-productive to innovation. A range of ideas is used in developing a more productive set of policies for basic research and development.

Your browser does not support PDFs. Download the PDF.

Download PDF