One of the challenges confronting philosophers of technology is conceptualizing the relationship between humans and technology without drawing a neat distinction between the two. Many philosophers do this by positing a variation of the argument that technological artifacts consist of two
inseparable dimensions, a functional one and a hermeneutic one, both of which are necessary for a technology to ‘work’. Admittedly, recognizing this two-dimensional ontology is easy; taking the next step and theorizing this relationship is more difficult because it requires both a sensitivity for empirical research into the design and use of technologies and a conceptual vocabulary that accounts for the ways in which technologies are meaningful.

PAGES
408 – 411
DOI
All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Issues
Also in this issue:
-
Agnes Horvath, Magic and the Will to Science: A Political Anthropology of Liminal Technicality
-
Gibson Burrell, Ronald Hartz, David Harvie, Geoff Lightfoot, Simon Lilley and Friends, Shaping for Mediocrity: The Cancellation of Critical Thinking at our Universities
-
Bas de Boer, How Scientific Instruments Speak: Postphenomenology and Technological Mediations in Neuroscientific Practice
-
Bjørn Lomborg, False Alarm
-
How does innovation arise in the bicycle sector? The users’ role and their betrayal in the case of the ‘gravel bike’
Eduardo Beira and Andrew Feenberg (eds) Technology, Modernity, and Democracy: Essays by Andrew Feenberg
Book Review