Agnes Horvath has written about politics, sociology and the social functions of tricksters and other subversive forces. She appears well qualified to discuss the social function of magic, especially if, as the title of her book suggests, this function is associated with the social function of science. Magic and science are socially significant in pursuit of advantage through arcane knowledge and, usually, forces unperceived by the laity. The only problem with the title is that magic is a thing, while the ‘will to science’ is presumably a human psychological state. Is Horvath comparing apples with a lust for oranges? Surely in the course of this book, all will be made clear. Unfortunately, all is not made clear.

PAGES
117 – 118
DOI
All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Issues
Also in this issue:
-
Gibson Burrell, Ronald Hartz, David Harvie, Geoff Lightfoot, Simon Lilley and Friends, Shaping for Mediocrity: The Cancellation of Critical Thinking at our Universities
-
Bas de Boer, How Scientific Instruments Speak: Postphenomenology and Technological Mediations in Neuroscientific Practice
-
Bjørn Lomborg, False Alarm
-
How does innovation arise in the bicycle sector? The users’ role and their betrayal in the case of the ‘gravel bike’
-
von Hippel innovation
Agnes Horvath, Magic and the Will to Science: A Political Anthropology of Liminal Technicality
Book Review