Round about 1940, a number of elements related to innovation processes were pulled together and organized as ‘Schumpeterian innovation’. The result was to provide framing and focus – a useful new paradigm – to guide further innovation-related research. Today, we have reached the same point with respect to a new collection of innovation phenomena, defined relatively recently, that together contribute to a fundamentally different innovation paradigm. This paper explains these components – many developed and empirically tested only within the last four decades – and describes the overall new paradigm to which they contribute. The paper argues that it is appropriate to name this new paradigm after the individual who first envisioned it and, together with many collaborators, gradually characterized and tested the components needed to develop and explain the functioning of ‘von Hippel innovation’.

PAGES
74 – 91
DOI
All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Issues
Also in this issue:
-
Agnes Horvath, Magic and the Will to Science: A Political Anthropology of Liminal Technicality
-
Gibson Burrell, Ronald Hartz, David Harvie, Geoff Lightfoot, Simon Lilley and Friends, Shaping for Mediocrity: The Cancellation of Critical Thinking at our Universities
-
Bas de Boer, How Scientific Instruments Speak: Postphenomenology and Technological Mediations in Neuroscientific Practice
-
Bjørn Lomborg, False Alarm
-
How does innovation arise in the bicycle sector? The users’ role and their betrayal in the case of the ‘gravel bike’