PAGES

231 – 239

DOI

10.1080/08109020802270190
©
Arthur M. Diamond.

All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Issues

Also in this issue:

How Institutional Incentives and Constraints Affect the Progress of Science

Arthur M. Diamond.

Scholars studying science policy have long wondered how the progress of science is affected by scientists’ motives, and by the incentives and constraints that scientific institutions create. This paper aims to answer two objections to the soundness and applicability of the ‘economics of science’ that arise from such issues. I argue that the progress of science can occur even if scientists exhibit a wide range of motives; but that the pace of scientific progress will depend, in part, on the incentives and constraints provided by scientific institutions. I also discuss the implications of path dependence for the epistemological status of science.

Your browser does not support PDFs. Download the PDF.

Download PDF