This article uses findings from a close study of eleven people’s telecommunications uses at home and a national survey to argue for the importance of technology development which is based on people’s demonstrated uses and interests. Values about privacy at home and practices of controlling phone intrusion were shown to be related to choice of future technologies. Those who wanted to be accessible to callers chose services which enhanced communication such as video phones whereas those who wanted to control incoming calls chose services such as ‘intelligent’ phones. The study illustrates the contribution of ethnographic approaches and criticises research based on economic models and quantification alone.

PAGES
80 – 89
DOI
All content is freely available without charge to users or their institutions. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission of the publisher or the author. Articles published in the journal are distributed under a http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Issues
Also in this issue:
-
Agnes Horvath, Magic and the Will to Science: A Political Anthropology of Liminal Technicality
-
Gibson Burrell, Ronald Hartz, David Harvie, Geoff Lightfoot, Simon Lilley and Friends, Shaping for Mediocrity: The Cancellation of Critical Thinking at our Universities
-
Bas de Boer, How Scientific Instruments Speak: Postphenomenology and Technological Mediations in Neuroscientific Practice
-
Bjørn Lomborg, False Alarm
-
How does innovation arise in the bicycle sector? The users’ role and their betrayal in the case of the ‘gravel bike’
RE-ENGINEERING TELECOMMUNICATIONS FOR THE WAY PEOPLE WANT TO LIVE: SOCIAL RESEARCH IN THE DESIGN OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES
Original Articles
No PDF file available for display.